What Processor Does Samsung Have A 50

Clock frequency and number of processor cores

The most important thing in a processor is not the number of cores, but its full performance, but still, simplistically, we can say that:

  • 2 cores. Exclusively for office work, the Internet and the simplest games;
  • 4 cores. For universal and inexpensive gaming computers;
  • 6 cores. For medium and powerful gaming computers;
  • 8 cores. For very powerful gaming computers;
  • 10 cores or higher. For extremely powerful gaming and specialized computers (processing or etc.).

It is worth noting that it makes no sense to buy powerful processors for simple tasks and work on the Internet, since in comparison with cheaper models, the increase in system speed will be insignificant, and the full potential of the processor will not be revealed.

It would seem that the higher the processor frequency, the better it is, but in reality this is not always the case. For example, the dual-core Intel Celeron G3900 and J1800 operate at similar frequencies, but the former is almost 4 times faster according to the test results, because the processor speed depends on other factors as well. Benchmarks are the best indicator of the actual performance of a particular processor.

Best mid-range processors:

Amd Ryzen 3 2200G, AMD Ryzen 3 3200G. Optimal 4-core processors as a base for universal and mid-budget gaming computers (games at medium and maximum quality settings with an appropriate card, but not higher than GeForce GTX 1650/1060). But even without a discrete card it will be possible to play modern games at minimum and sometimes medium quality settings;

Amd Ryzen 5 1400 or slightly weaker Intel Core i3-9100F. The best processors for mid-budget gaming computers for cards up to the level of GeForce GTX 1650/1060 (games at medium and maximum quality settings).

Features of choosing a computer processor

If we analyze the results of processor performance tests and current prices, we can conclude that in the middle of 2020, the highest performance-price combination for AMD Ryzen series and Intel 9-10th generation processors.

  • At a price up to 50 USD all processors are quite fast for most common tasks and almost all simple games (for example, AMD Athlon 220GE), but at the same time AMD processors are almost twice as profitable as Intel processors.
  • At a price of 50-100 USD most AMD processors are also significantly more profitable, although Intel has models that are quite worthy for their price. Separately, I would like to highlight the excellent inexpensive AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and 3200G processors, which, at their low price, have excellent performance and a good integrated card, which is almost at the level of the discrete NVidia GeForce 1030. Among processors without an integrated card, Intel Core i3-9100F is advantageous and especially AMD Ryzen 3 1200.
  • At a price of 100-200 USD most AMD processors have approximately double the performance of comparable Intel processors. Among AMD, Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 2600 are the most profitable, among Intel. I5-10400F.
  • At a price of 200-400 USD AMD Ryzen 5 3600X and Ryzen 7 3700X / 3800X processors are very beneficial, although Intel 10th generations (eg Intel i5-10400, i5-10600K, i5-10700K) also have a good combination of performance and price. It should be noted that according to the results of many tests, Intel processors allow on identical cards to have an average of 5-10% higher FPS than AMD processors of the same level.
  • The most powerful processors are AMD Ryzen 9 and Threadripper, as well as Intel i9, although there is little point in buying such expensive processors, since for the vast majority of applications, the performance of a slightly more modest, but several times cheaper Intel Core will be enough. I5-10700K or AMD Ryzen 7 3800X.

Often on the forums, they criticize the factory (BOX, boxed) cooling system and strongly recommend using from third-party manufacturers. In fact, boxed cooling systems are designed specifically for their processors, so they have at least good quality and low noise level, and the installation of an improved cooling system is necessary only for the most powerful processors or during overclocking. A possible reason for such a frequent criticism of the boxed cooling system. Outdated motherboard BIOS, as very often after updating the processor temperature drops by 5-12 degrees.

Features of choosing a processor with an embedded card (hybrid processor, APU)

Most modern processors would be correctly called hybrid, since in addition to the computational cores themselves, they also include other components that were previously in the chipset or were generally installed separately, including cards. Even by modern standards, the performance of almost all built-in cards is sufficient with a margin for common tasks, and some new models. And for many modern games at minimum and even medium quality settings. Higher integration of components translates into less overall power consumption and expected higher reliability of the computer, so processors with an embedded card are ideal for home compact media centers and office computers, as well as for general-purpose computers with initial gaming capabilities or with the expectation of further upgrades to more powerful by card.

Since the memory is not a fast separate photographic memory, but a much slower DDR3 or DDR4 RAM, the performance of an integrated hybrid processor card, by definition, cannot be very high, and for full-fledged gaming computers, a game card of at least an average level is still needed. But if games at medium and maximum quality settings do not plan to live on a computer, the budget is very limited, or in the future it is planned to upgrade with a game card, then a processor with an integrated card. This is ideal.

Until mid-2015, the performance of integrated cards in Intel processors did not allow them to be called entry-level gaming cards, even conditionally, since their performance was significantly lower than similar class cards in AMD processors. But now many new 6-10 generation Intel processors have cards that are equal or even superior to those in AMD processors, although the advent of Ryzen processors again makes AMD processors very attractive due to the really decent performance of the integrated card, which is only slightly inferior to the discrete NVidia GeForce 1030.

Currently (mid-2020), all built-in cards in Intel and AMD processors will cope perfectly with non-gaming tasks, the built-in cards Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 3 2200G / 3200G), Radeon Vega 11 (Ryzen 5 2400G / 3400G) ), as well as Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 630. The built-in Intel HD Graphics 530 and Intel UHD Graphics 610 are weaker, so their performance will be sufficient only for games at the lowest quality settings. It should be noted that the performance of all built-in cards depends very much on the frequency of the RAM and the enabled dual-channel mode.

Best Budget Processors:

Amd Athlon 200GE, AMD Athlon 220GE. Inexpensive processors for entry-level general purpose computers. Their power will be enough for all common tasks with a margin, and the built-in card. For many modern games at minimum quality settings. A good basis for inexpensive gaming computers, since it makes sense to upgrade them later with a budget card, but not higher than the GeForce GTX 1050Ti;

Amd Ryzen 3 1200.Very profitable processor, but requires a discrete card.

Motherboards with embedded processors

Motherboards with embedded (soldered) processors have very significant advantages. This is a low price, small size, energy efficiency and complete silence when using an SSD-disk and a silent power supply, and the latter factor seems unnatural at first, since most users are accustomed to more or less noise from the system unit. The main purpose of such hybrids of motherboards and processors. Base for office computers or HTPCs (home media centers, which are usually paired with a TV or monitor).

Unfortunately, it is impossible to make a compact and at the same time silent cooling of a powerful processor, therefore processors with very modest characteristics are usually used. Nevertheless, they all allow you to comfortably work in office programs, the Internet, watch online / offline and even play not only simple games like “Zuma” or “Farm Frenzy”, but also some more difficult ones.

Motherboards with embedded processors:

  • Intel N3050, J1800, J3355 have low performance and are designed for the weakest tasks, although paired with a system SSD drive they can quite comfortably cope with office work and surfing the Internet;
  • Intel J1900, N3160, J4005 and especially Intel J3455, J4105, J4205, J5005 have higher performance, although the performance of these processors is still low by modern standards.

Although the best integrated processor in the middle of 2020 in terms of performance and heat dissipation is the Intel Pentium Silver J5005, the rather old, but very cheap Intel Celeron J1900 in small mini-ITX motherboards with passive cooling looks very attractive ( e.G. Asus J1900I-C).

Which processor in a laptop to choose: configuration options. Which processor to choose and what it will be capable of?

The main manufacturers of desktop processors (including notebooks) are Intel and AMD. Each year both companies release new processors with better performance and unique technologies. On the one hand, this is good. Progress does not stand still and there is movement forward. But along with the new features, sockets on motherboards also change, which means that the upgrade leads to almost complete replacement of other components, motherboard, memory and even disk drives. Although the interface of the latter is compatible with new and old CPUs, copy speeds over time fail to meet current needs. However, an upgrade in a laptop sometimes comes down to just adding strips of RAM and replacing the HDD with an SSD.

As for laptops, as you know, the processors in them are not replaceable and cannot be upgraded. So, if you buy such a device, then you should choose immediately with a reserve for several years in advance.

In this regard, if you are not ready to spend money on a powerful device today, be prepared for the fact that after 3 years your laptop, focused only on performing office tasks, will become very outdated and annoy you with slowness in other areas, for example, in the browser or updated Windows.

Processor types by performance

The processors currently used in laptops (and desktop PCs) can be clearly divided by performance into 4 lines (for Intel processors):

Intel Corethe most productive processors
Intel Core Mmid-range processors
Intel Pentiumbelow average performance
Intel Celeronlow performance processors

In addition, the processors of the Core line are also divided into classes, depending on the functionality. So, Core i3 is the weakest in this line, Core i5 is medium, Core i7 is powerful, and Core i9 is super powerful.

Pentium and Celeron are based on the Atom core and based on the Core core. If you see the first number 3 in the designation of this processor, for example, Celeron N3010, then its release year is 2015 and 2016. Number 4 means a more recent modification of 2017-2018.

For modern laptops, processors of the 6th, 7th and 8th generation are relevant. It is indicated by the first digit in the chip index:

  • Core i3-6100U. 6th generation Skylake (2015),
  • Core i5-6200U. 6th Gen Skylake (2015),
  • Core i7-6500U. 6th generation Skylake (2015),
  • Core i7-7500U. 7th Gen Kaby Lake (2016),
  • Core i7-7Y75. 7th Gen Kaby Lake (2016),
  • Core i7-8550U. 8th Gen Coffee Lake 2017.

Recent processors in 2018 have a K index.

What Processor Does Samsung Have A 50

The designations for AMD processors are simpler, and the first digit means the year of release:

  • 5. 2013 (A6-5200),
  • 6. 2014 (A6-6310),
  • 7. 2015 (A6-7310),
  • 9. 2016 (A6-9210).

The current mid-range processor for notebooks is the AMD A12 9720P 2700MHz processor, which users purchase for office and photography needs. The top mobile processors from this manufacturer are AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 2200 MHz and higher.

Which processor is better for a laptop: understanding configurations

When choosing a laptop, one of the most important issues is its performance. Central to this is the processor used in the device. Chip will tell you how to choose the right CPU based on the tasks set so as not to overpay.

Modern computers, be they desktops or laptops, even in the smallest configurations have ample power for office tasks. But, what if you need a device for a wider range of work, including for infrequent games? Which processor in a laptop is better to choose, and at the same time not overpay decent money for gaming power?

Experienced users will probably object, stressing that there is no extra performance and it is better not to save on the processor. This is true, but with one caveat. If you have a budget for the purchase with a margin. After all, the for laptops, even with an average performance, start at 50,000 rubles, which is a decent amount in today’s low wages. In addition, the powerful processor also has high energy consumption, which means it is not suitable for long-term operation from the built-in battery. The trade-off between performance and energy efficiency is also important here.

In this regard, we will offer four optimal configurations with different processors, allowing to keep within the allocated budget: up to 25,000 rubles, up to 40,000 rubles, up to 70,000 rubles. Expensive laptops can be safely attributed to the premium segment and gaming devices.

But first, it is worthwhile to briefly dwell on the types of processors and for which tasks they are most suitable.

Laptop for work and study

Let’s start with undemanding tasks: such as working with documents in office programs, e-mail, as well as surfing the Web through a browser and watching on Youtube and other services. For all this, a laptop with a Celeron, Pentium and Core i3 processor (as needed) will be enough. When buying, you should pay attention to the version of the processor, so that the year of release is fresher and the capacity of the system disk is from 128 GB. As the best option, we offer three laptops with different office productivity processors, but with good equipment:

Characteristics of the processor installed in the samsung a50

According to the company Exynos 9610 should give us additional power and speed. This is a “new performance standard” and the like, but let’s put statements aside.

How much is the core processor in the samsung galaxy a50: equipped with eight cores, with the frequency of four 2.3 and four at 1.6 Hz.

It also has a very young photographic processor, although the photographic system will be correct: Mali-G72 is the one responsible for photography.

It is based on a 10nm manufacturing process, so it should provide the highest possible performance.

With Exynos 9610 you can use a 24MP camera and record in 4K resolution at 120fps.

It will also support displays with resolutions up to 2560×1600 pixels, LPDDR4X RAM, and eMMC 5.1 and UFS 2.1 flash memory.

What is the processor in samsung galaxy a50. Core characteristics and frequency

If you need a powerful phone, then first of all you should find out what kind of processor it contains, its frequency, the number of cores and a photographic processor.

In the phone samsung galaxy a50, the Korean manufacturer has put the Exynos 9610 model on which other systems should certainly take an example.

According to the manufacturer, it is of the highest quality, which, with its performance, confuses even flagship offers from Qualcomm.

In short, the Exynos 9610 model has great potential. Let’s look at its characteristics.

Comparison of samsung a50 processor with qualcomm snapdragon 845

The Qualcomm snapdragon 845 is quite powerful, and if you compare it with the Exynos 9610, it turns out that its photography frequency is 20% higher. Therefore, the intervals between Opening applications and games will crush the Exynos 9610.

Also qualcomm has 2.9x better computing performance. It has 2.5x higher memory bandwidth.

Support for more RAM and 22% higher frequency and better instruction set architecture.

Definitely the Snapdragon 845 is better as it is a flagship processor, while the exynos 9610 is a mid-range processor.

While the Snapdragon 845 has the much more powerful Adreno 630, while the Exynos has a Mali G 72 MP3, which is much weaker than the Adreno 630.

Only in spite of the mid-range samsung a50 processor, so it is possible that other manufacturers will also be tempted by this.

We’ll see. If you want more details, you can ask me in the comments. Thanks for watching. Have a good day!

4 comments

Why is it said that this processor does not work well on the android platform? And why the samsung a50 is incredibly hot. In 15 minutes more
zholay game for example (PUBG MOBILE, terraria, wot blitz) it heats up to 38-40 °?

What many say is heated, but what does not work well, I have not met.

No, you just choose the Original, it costs 17,000 rubles

General information

Samsung was founded in 1938 and is engaged in the production of various household appliances, including TVs, laptops, computers, tablets and smartphones. And in each of the niches occupied in the market, this company has a leading position. Even if you are not particularly interested in news from the world of technology, you have probably heard about Samsung more than once. Well, if you delved into what is happening on the mobile technology market a little more, then you know that Samsung’s flagship smartphones and tablets compete even with the Apple concern itself.

Which is better: Samsung or Xiaomi? Korean vs Chinese.

The modern market offers a huge amount of equipment in a very different range of technical capabilities and prices. Among the most popular brands are Xiaomi and Samsung companies, and not only in the domestic, but also in the world market. And very often people planning to buy a phone wonder what to choose: Xiaomi or Samsung? Of course, each manufacturer has advantages, and each specific model must be compared. But there are also general trends and characteristic advantages of each company, which we will discuss in this article.

Comparison of Samsung Galaxy J5 and Xiaomi Redmi 3 models

As mentioned above, each phone must be analyzed separately, identifying its competitive advantages and disadvantages. Due to the fact that these manufacturers have an extensive lineup, it is not possible to compare all of their gadgets in one article. But we suggest that you take as a basis for comparison one model from each company, which most characterizes the entire brand.

In fairness, let’s take examples from the budget lines of both companies. Still, in terms of flagship mobile devices, Xiaomi is noticeably lagging behind the market leaders, but in the budget sector it feels confident. Today we offer to compare Samsung Galaxy J5 and Xiaomi Redmi 3.

Design and ergonomics. Of course, it’s up to you to decide which smartphone is better in terms of design, it all depends on your taste. Subjectively, it seems that the Chinese smartphone wins in terms of ergonomics. In terms of weight and dimensions, the device is noticeably smaller, therefore it is more convenient to use it.

Display. In both cases, the screen has HD resolution with a pixel density of 294 ppi. So, making a choice based on this parameter is inappropriate.

  • Performance. The Xiaomi smartphone has an eight-core processor, while Samsung has a quad-core one. In terms of productivity, the “Chinese” is almost 3 times ahead of its competitor! The photographic accelerator is also better at Xiaomi. Ram for Xiaomi is 3 GB, while Samsung has 2 GB. Therefore, if you plan to make a choice whether to buy Samsung or Xiaomi, starting from the maximum performance of the gadget, then you should definitely choose a representative of the Chinese company.
  • Inner memory. The volume of internal memory in both cases is 16 GB. Supports work with memory cards. Most likely, the standard volume of ROM will not be enough and you will have to buy an SD card. But even with its minimal volume, it is easy to meet the basic needs of the user.
  • Cameras. The resolution of the cameras is the same in both cases, but the quality of the photos is better for the “Korean”. Samsung phones have significantly more optimized software presets that help them create better quality in a variety of shooting scenarios. At Xiaomi, the incredible blur appears for no apparent reason, then the color rendition does not climb into any gate. And this situation, unfortunately, is observed in most budget gadgets of the Chinese manufacturer.

  • Autonomy. Xiaomi is the undisputed favorite in terms of autonomy. Its battery is 4100 mAh, while the competitor’s battery is 2600 mAh. Xiaomi also has more energy consumption due to increased performance, but this difference is not particularly noticeable. Therefore, the “Chinese” will last longer without charging. Up to three days with moderate use.
  • As you can see, despite the fact that Xiaomi appeared on the market much later than Samsung, the Chinese manufacturer today can offer a high-quality and inexpensive smartphone, which is even ahead of its competitor in the price segment in terms of characteristics. Both devices have good capabilities in terms of performance, but Xiaomi wins in additional indicators. So if you choose a mobile device for yourself in the budget segment and decide which is better. Samsung or Xiaomi, then we recommend giving preference to the product of the Chinese company.